Are usually safest distance coming from a 5G cell Tower system?

· 3 min read
Are usually safest distance coming from a 5G cell Tower system?

If you've ever been through a town and spotted tiny 5G cell towers on the poles of street lights. They look like small boxes however, they're actually transmitting wireless signals from cellular providers to your phone.

The smaller ones are being replaced by the larger specially-designed cell towers. While they're not as noticeable but they can still create problems for those who live nearby.
A Federal Communications Commission's Radiation Exposure Thresholds

The FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds define the safe limit at which one can expose to electromagnetic radiation from wireless devices. The exposure limits are based on research that show that RF energy can cause harm to health.

The rate of absorption called the specific absorption rate (SAR) is an indication of the amount of radiofrequency energy absorbed by tissue. It's typically 1.6 Watts per kilogram spread over a kilogram of tissue.



However, because 5g transmits at higher frequencies this could be able to increase the intensity of energy on the skin and other exposed body parts. This can lead to many potential harms, including exacerbated the development of skin conditions like dermatitis, cancer of the skin and cataracts.

Due to the possible negative effects of 5G radiation, PSU has chosen to set a general localized power density limit of 4 mW/cm2 based on the average on 1cm2, and never exceeding 30 minutes for all 5G services running at 3000 GHz. This limit for localization is in line with the peak SAR that is spatially averaged at 1.6 W/kg, averaged over one 5 grams of body tissue, at 6 GHz.
The FCC's Maximum Exposure Thresholds

If you've ever used a mobile phone, then you've probably realized that the safest range from the tower is around 400 meters away. This is due to the power of transmission from a cell tower increases dramatically the farther your location from the tower.

While this sounds like something that's good, the reality is that people who live close to towers might be more susceptible to health issues. For instance, a study conducted in 2014 in India found that those who lived within 50m of cell towers had significantly more health complaints than those who lived farther distance from them.

But, the study revealed that those who relocated into areas farther away from the cell towers saw their symptoms improve within a few days. Other studies have revealed that exposure to high frequencies of radiofrequency electromagnetic fields (EMFs) can lead to cancer, brain tumors and other health issues.

This is because RF radiation, which is used in wireless communication, can penetrate the human body's outer layer, the skin.  is 5g harmful for humans and the environment  is important to understand because the skin acts as a barrier to protect against injuries caused by mechanical forces, infections by pathogenic microorganisms, and entry of toxic substances. Additionally, it is the biggest organ of the human body and is accountable for protecting other organs.
The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds

The FCC's Minimum Exposition Thresholds are based upon various assumptions that aren't supported by scientific research. They include the incorrect assumption that short-term exposures to RF radiation are safe because of the minimal absorption into body (i.e., tissue heating).

This assumption does not take into account the greater penetration of ELF elements of modulated radio signals as well as the consequences of brief bursts of heat caused by RF pulses. These assumptions do not correspond with current understanding of the biological consequences of RF radiation, and thus, they should not be relied upon for health-protection exposure standards.

Additionally,  Get more info  and FCC limit the maximum limits of exposure to peak local SARs that are based on the peak spatial specific absorption rate (psSAR) that is an inadequate dosimetric tool to assess the amount of radiation exposure. In particular it is inconclusive for frequencies above 6 GHz. Furthermore, psSAR has not been evaluated for RF radiation that is exposed to other environmental agents , such as sunlight. In the event of interactions, RF radiation with other environmental agents could cause synergistic or antagonistic results. This could result in the risk of having adverse health adverse effects. For example, exposure to RF radiation along with exposure to sunlight can increase the risk of skin cancer and exacerbate other skin conditions like acne.